William Benson (VBACreations.Com)
vbacreations at gmail.com
Wed Oct 19 20:50:39 CDT 2011
I think this is fine *IF* 2010 is not going to flake out on your users after deployment when you're all confident in your software cuz it worked fine in development... I develop (the limited bit I do) in 2010 so that if it doesn't work for me, I won't expect it to work for them. If something is supposed to work, I don't see the benefit of gaining false assurance just because it does in 2003. And I have definitely seen code I wrote in 2003 not work in 2010, I just can't remember what just now. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 4:29 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Known Bugs List in A2K7/10 I'm still developing primarily in 2003 and deploying the .mdbs on 07/10 installations. Generally it works seamlessly. -- Stuart On 19 Oct 2011 at 10:14, Gustav Brock wrote: > Hi Mark and Darry and ... > > Oh my, what a frightening thread. You guys and Charlotte really scare > one from ever touching development in Access 2007 or 2010. I never > moved beyond 2003 ... then took a sharp right (pun and pun intended!) > turn to .Net, C#, and Visual Studio. > > /gustav > > > >>> darryl at whittleconsulting.com.au 19-10-2011 01:51 >>> > Thanks Mark, > > Looks like am in for some future 'fun'. Right now I use A2007 80% of > the time vs A2010 for the other 20%. Perhaps my current experience > and feelings are based on this ratio rather than the actual issues in > each individual product. > > I do find A2010 more finished and smooth to use, but that maybe > because I don't push it around too much right now. > > Let just say I respect your (and everyone on this list) opinions and > happy to listen to the (usually excellent) advice you all give on > these matters. > > Cheers > Darry. > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark Simms > Sent: Wednesday, 19 October 2011 10:08 AM To: 'Access Developers > discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Known Bugs List > in A2K7/10 > > No way. 2010 is way more pain than 2007. That being said, AC 2007 > could easily be blown-up by simply moving form controls on a multipage > control. The sheer number of complaints about 2010 on the social.msdn > website forum for Access is pretty much the proof in the pudding > so-to-speak. > > > I am with Doug, I prefer A2010 to A2007 which I find painful beast > > to use most of the time. in-elegant and clunky is how I best > > describe it - and freaking weird. It does some strange things from > > time to time. > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com