Kenneth Ismert
kismert at gmail.com
Tue Sep 20 13:45:03 CDT 2011
All, SSDs sound ideal for server applications, except for one nagging question: when will it wear out? SSD endurance summary http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html But, there are circumstances where SSDs make a compelling argument for adoption: SSDs replacing HDDs? that's not exactly the way it happened http://www.storagesearch.com/bitmicro-art3.html If you do spring for them, get the (much more expensive) server-rated SSDs using SLC memory -- see response to Micker in comments: Debunking SSD lifespan and random write performance concerns http://maxschireson.com/2011/04/21/debunking-ssd-lifespan-and-random-write-performance-concerns/ Don't expect consumer-level SSDs to last very long in a server environment. -Ken > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving < > accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:10:26 -0400 > Subject: Re: [AccessD] SSDs and BE storage > Well, it seems I will be answering this question in the next few weeks. > The client is building a server in the next couple of weeks, which will > include a raid1 SSD as the data store. Phase 1 of the story will be to move > the access BEs to that SSD and use that while we migrate the data into > something else (MySQL maybe). > > My FE / framework logs the start / stop time when opening forms so it > should be easy to discover whether the SSD makes things significantly > faster. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Dan Waters" <df.waters at comcast.net> > To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" < > accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:48:52 -0500 > Subject: Re: [AccessD] SSDs and BE storage > Hi John, > > A few months ago I switched to using an SSD for the Windows 7 OS and > applications, and a WD Black HD for data storage. And yes, things are > significantly faster. If I had a 2nd gen Intel CPU I'd see another jump in > speed. But the way it is now, every Access file I open is up in about 1 > second (if it doesn't have startup code). VS 2010 takes about 35 seconds > to > open and a VS app takes about 5 seconds to open. > > If you're going to all SSD, then you'll see a dramatic difference. > > Dan > >