[AccessD] Access 2K subforms bound to SQL Server.

David McAfee davidmcafee at gmail.com
Fri Jan 20 15:41:38 CST 2012


Actually, I prefer A97 & A2K over A2007 too :)


On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Stuart McLachlan <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg>wrote:

>
>
> On 20 Jan 2012 at 12:48, jwcolby wrote:
>
> > The problem is that they remain firmly mired in Access 2000.  Yep.  Sigh.
> >
>
> I've got one client in the same situation, but mired in A97 :(
>
> > The biggest issue with Access 2K from the perspective of SQL Server is
> that forms cannot be bound to
> > recordsets and still be editable.
> >
>
> They can if you use ODBC linking to the SQL Server tables and bind the
> form the tables of
> Access queries based on them
>
> --
> Stuart McLachlan
>
> Ph:    +675 340 4392
> Mob: +675 7100 2028
> Web: http://www.lexacorp.com.pg
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>


More information about the AccessD mailing list