Elizabeth.J.Doering at wellsfargo.com
Elizabeth.J.Doering at wellsfargo.com
Fri Jul 13 10:57:56 CDT 2012
I concur. I haven't contributed as much as I would have liked over the years, usually because someone had a smarter answer while I was still scratching my head. But I doubt I would seek out a website to visit regularly, and I love having the ongoing conversations arrive in my email. Thanks, Liz -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Debbie Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 10:38 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Where to publish stuff Sadly, if we switched formats, I would probably rarely visit. The email format works for me, the list format does not except for specific questions. Without the regular updates via email, I will probably loose touch with the people behind the answers which is something I like a lot about access D. Debbie Sent from my iPhone On Jul 13, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Salakhetdinov Shamil <mcp2004 at mail.ru> wrote: > Hi Gustav -- > > A "Database Advisors" linked-in Group? What then about this Access-D and dba-VB and other of Database Advisors discussion lists? > > I'm for several years in MS Access-related and other Linked-in groups, mainly "lurking" because the level on discussions/feedback isn't looking satisfactory - a lot of "noise" (IMO) coming from non-OT Linked-in postings (and OT messages (except job postings) are not welcomed there)... > > Here in Access-D we have quite a few of off-topic threads (and I'm sorry being the one who started some off-topic threads here and participated/participating in other) still this group is the best for me concerning MS Access related stuff, and the "feeling of family" we have here is unique as Charlotte noted ... > > Another very good MS Access-related list is Access-L... > > What kind of articles do you plan to publish? > Can you split them into several small parts? > I missed the beginning of this thread - did you consider using Code Project (http://www.codeproject.com/) to post your artilces? > > StackOverflow is a source where IMO you can always get a qualified answer on your questions, sometimes very detailed answer comes in minutes, but StackOverflow isn't looking as a right place to post long articles/questions... > > What about "Forum: Access for Developers" http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/accessdev/threads at MSDN's Access Developer Center - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/aa905400.aspx ? (I have never participated in it - anybody? - it could be now what were in the past UseNet's microsoft.public.access.* newsgroups?) > > And comp.databases.ms-access - does anybody here is (still) participating in it/using it? It was always very active and responsive especially in the first part of 90-ies when MS Access was in big favor everywhere and "everything was new with using MS Access in application development"... ( I have just found one of my postings from this group from Nov 1994 - https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.databases.ms-access/jnPyljxvdjc :) ) > > Thank you. > > -- Shamil > > > Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:12:08 +0200 от "Gustav Brock" <gustav at cactus.dk>: > > > > Hi Charlotte > > Yes, why not? I felt tempted just to do it but realised that it wouldn't be right; someone from our board should be the originator for such a group. > > /gustav > >>>> charlotte.foust at gmail.com 13-07-12 4:20 >>> > We could start our own--Database Advisors Group! > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Stuart McLachlan <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg>wrote: > >> I'm on two. >> >> Professional Microsoft Access Developers' Network >> and >> Microsoft Access Gurus. >> >> Neither of them feel like family the way DBA lists do though :-) >> >> -- >> Stuart >> >> On 12 Jul 2012 at 9:24, Rusty Hammond wrote: >> >>> Anyone else using LinkedIn? I'm subscribed to an Access group there and >>> it seems to work pretty well for this kind of stuff. Ability to assign >>> moderators, comments posted to each question, ability to search, etc... >>> It's like facebook but for business and without all the junk that comes >>> with facebook (games, etc...). >>> >>> Just a thought. >>> >>> Rusty > > -- This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.