[AccessD] Access 2013 -- MDB Back Ends Dead?

John - what does 'Access FEs play nice even across the internet.' mean?

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 12:28 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2013 -- MDB Back Ends Dead?

 >> Looks like my abandonment of the MDB format and serious investment in
SQL Server (both alone and as a BE for Access projects) is going to pay off
big-time.

Yep.  Access FEs play nice even across the internet.  Win-Win.

John W. Colby
Colby Consulting

Reality is what refuses to go away
when you do not believe in it

On 7/22/2012 11:23 AM, Arthur Fuller wrote:
> I just picked up this from the Google+ Access Gurus group, posted by 
> Armen Stein, one of the MVPs there:
>
> "Speed is a whole different ballgame now. Since 2013 now uses SQL 
> Server to store the data, speed is much better, even over larger 
> recordsets. Also, aggregrate queries are supported again. Overall from 
> what I've seen, database size and speed are not concerns anymore."
>
> Looks like my abandonment of the MDB format and serious investment in 
> SQL Server (both alone and as a BE for Access projects) is going to 
> pay off big-time.
>

--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com