William Benson (VBACreations.Com)
vbacreations at gmail.com
Sat Jul 28 02:54:06 CDT 2012
OK, so this is OT but ... we're good at that. I let my wife use my new smart phone on 4G LTE data connection while she streamed an episode of Miss Marple - and watched 400MB of my 2GB/month data plan get used in under hour. And that was not even HD, and being displayed on a small screen. The larger US Telecoms want $10 for every 2 GB (let's say it's 5 hours, being conservative) of streaming. This rate is capped at $50 / 20GB, at which point it becomes almost 3 x that. So let's say for argument sake this is 50 hours of digital entertainment, consumed by 3 or 4 persons in a household, sharing a data plan. That can be used in a week, let alone a month! And no, wireless is not always the answer, suppose you want to watch the episode in a moving vehicle, or waiting in a doctor's office, or in a park ... you name it. The solution, I think, is simple: download the shows ahead of time, and watch them later. Ah, but this is not in accord with the content provider's licensing arrangements with Hollywood. Agreed, but suppose this could be solved by creating a new video format- which downloads MOST of the video content but each frame requires supplementation with some additional (low-volume) bits or a filter-based decoder... and the "key" bits are only available in streaming format. The supplemental data could be delivered via a stable connection and not consume much bandwidth, and the media player would just have to "blend" the decoded (stored) data with the supplemental bits (or unlock key, if that is another approach). Naturally, care needs to be taken that these supplemental bits are regularly changing and are according to an algorithm which makes them nearly impossible to emulate - but that is just a little time and money to perfect, I am sure. Something has to be done to reduce stress on wireless spectrum, it cannot support the needs of the wireless public. Wireless carriers claim that phasing out unlimited data plans and these new exorbitant data charges are the result of too much stress on their fragile networks, which just cannot meet the demands. So, my idea is, cut back on the demand - and shift the burden to the rest of the infrastructure - and do it smart, so that it doesn't invite video piracy. Any thoughts?