[AccessD] Master/Detail Classes in Access

This would be for unbound forms, and more particularly for SQL Server as
the BE.

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Kenneth Ismert <kismert at gmail.com> wrote:

> Arthur,
>
> Without more details, it is hard to know how to advise you.
>
> If these forms are bound, the recordsets themselves are object
> abstractions of the data. I see little point in creating an object
> wrapper for a base object, if all you are going to do is simulate
> functionality that the base handles perfectly well.
>
> But if the forms are unbound, I don't know off the top of my head if
> you can create multiple rows in the subform using just a collection of
> generic objects. Maybe this is a recent feature. Still, you might be
> better off binding the subform to a disconnected recordset, and again
> use the built-in functionality to navigate.
>
>