Heenan, Lambert
Lambert.Heenan at chartisinsurance.com
Tue May 1 08:11:17 CDT 2012
Hi Shamil, I would be inclined to say that the code from codeplex is better. The logic is a little bit obscure, but then professional c/c++/c# codes have always tended to be a tad brief in their style. However a brief period of study makes it clearly correct. The reason I would prefer the codeplex code is that it only has 6 comparison operations, where the mere mortals code uses 10. Where there are many thousands of objects being compared in a tight loop that could significantly increase the execution time. Lambert -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov Shamil Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 8:34 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: [AccessD] CodePlex WCF Community code snippet Hi All -- Sorry I'm posting C# code snippet here as my question/quick poll is more about coding style than anything else: I have occasionally got browsing through the following CodePlex WCF Community source code: http://wcf.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/66aa503c963c#WCFJQuery%2fTest%2fMicrosoft.Runtime.Serialization.Json.FunctionalTests%2fCommon%2fUtil.cs ... public static bool CompareObjects<T>(T o1, T o2) where T : class { if ((o1 == null) != (o2 == null)) { return false; } return (o1 == null) || o1.Equals(o2); } ... And I have got stuck first trying to get its logic. Would you consider the above code more professional and maintainable and effective than the following "mere mortals" code version? If Yes/No - why? public static bool CompareObjects2<T>(T o1, T o2) where T : class { if (o1 == null && o2 == null) return true; if (o1 != null && o2 == null) return false; if (o1 == null && o2 != null) return false; return o1.Equals(o2); } Thank you ;) -- Shamil -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com