Heenan, Lambert
Lambert.Heenan at chartisinsurance.com
Tue May 1 08:11:17 CDT 2012
Hi Shamil,
I would be inclined to say that the code from codeplex is better. The logic is a little bit obscure, but then professional c/c++/c# codes have always tended to be a tad brief in their style. However a brief period of study makes it clearly correct.
The reason I would prefer the codeplex code is that it only has 6 comparison operations, where the mere mortals code uses 10. Where there are many thousands of objects being compared in a tight loop that could significantly increase the execution time.
Lambert
-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov Shamil
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 8:34 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: [AccessD] CodePlex WCF Community code snippet
Hi All --
Sorry I'm posting C# code snippet here as my question/quick poll is more about coding style than anything else:
I have occasionally got browsing through the following CodePlex WCF Community source code:
http://wcf.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/66aa503c963c#WCFJQuery%2fTest%2fMicrosoft.Runtime.Serialization.Json.FunctionalTests%2fCommon%2fUtil.cs
...
public static bool CompareObjects<T>(T o1, T o2) where T : class
{
if ((o1 == null) != (o2 == null))
{
return false;
}
return (o1 == null) || o1.Equals(o2);
}
...
And I have got stuck first trying to get its logic.
Would you consider the above code more professional and maintainable and effective than the following "mere mortals" code version? If Yes/No - why?
public static bool CompareObjects2<T>(T o1, T o2) where T : class
{
if (o1 == null && o2 == null) return true;
if (o1 != null && o2 == null) return false;
if (o1 == null && o2 != null) return false;
return o1.Equals(o2);
}
Thank you ;)
-- Shamil
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com