Salakhetdinov Shamil
mcp2004 at mail.ru
Fri Oct 5 14:22:49 CDT 2012
Thank you, Jim -- I suppose most of us here have that potential - the issue is to find time and money (read: generous customers ready to invest into "bleeding edge" advanced projects) to actualize that our potentials :) In Fact ASP.NET MVC 4 (and DNN 7.x) do have KnockOut.js and jQuery (and even jQuery Mobile?) incorporated so learning and using "low level JavaScript and AJAX" is not required AFAIU... <<< ... triple threats ... >>> In fact more than triple :) - I'm really planning to start developing native mobile apps, WinPhone first, Android and iPhone - second... We will see... Thank you. -- Shamil Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:46:12 -0700 от "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca>: > > > > >Shamil: > > You have the potential to become one of the ultimate, high end, rare-breed > triple threats. :-) > > JavaScript FE, C# middle tier and a database/webserver BE expert. > > Jim > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov > Shamil > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:48 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Meet, Play, Follow & Contribute: TypeScript - an > open-source "Object-Oriented JavaScript" from MS.. > > Hi Jim and Gustav -- > > I'm currently looking at this scripting language as a tool to learn > JavaScript - get JavaScript's ready to use code snippets generated from > TypeScript code snippets, which would be relatively easy for me to start > developing as I'm rather fluent in C#... > > <<< > Is Anders just bored at MS? > >>> > He is probably preparing a solid ground for a "LINQ-powered TypeScript" to > get native JavaScript code generated from it? > > Thank you. > > -- Shamil > > Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:42:16 +0200 от "Gustav Brock" <gustav at cactus.dk>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Shamil > > > > > And here's the official intro by Anders Hejlsberg himself: > > > >http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Anders-Hejlsberg-Introducing-TypeScript > > > > > However, I love the top comment by Scott Koon. He has a point: > > > > > <quote> > > > I'll go on record as saying this is almost the dumbest idea ever. We already > have a strongly typed language that can compile to idiomatic JavaScript. > It's called C#. Or Java. Or Lisp. Or C++. > > > > > I know MS is working on a better VM for JavaScript. I know they are working > on making the JS tooling in Visual Studio better. Why are they waiting time > with this language? Is Anders just bored at MS? > > > </quote> > > > > > /gustav > > > > > > > >>> mcp2004 at mail.ru 04-10-12 18:50 >>> > > > Hi All -- > > > > > FYI:*http://www.typescriptlang.org/Playground/* > &*http://typescript.codeplex.com/ > > > > > Source: > *http://techcrunch.com/2012/10/01/microsoft-previews-new-javascript-like-pro > gramming-language-typescript/ > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > -- Shamil* > > > > > -- > > > AccessD mailing list > >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > > > > -- > AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > -- > AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >