jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Mon Sep 17 11:41:10 CDT 2012
Well... I would except that I continue to develop in 2003 when I do anything at all in Access. John W. Colby Colby Consulting Reality is what refuses to go away when you do not believe in it On 9/17/2012 11:26 AM, Charlotte Foust wrote: > I, too, built similar devices and kept them for backwards compatibility as > time moved on. Since MS has left backwards compatibility in the dust, > maybe we should too, John. > > Charlotte > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:07 AM, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>wrote: > >>> Oops! In my last post I referred to a new feature of Access and >> mistakenly called it the Parameters collection. It's actually called the >> TempVars collection. >> >> I did my own tempvars a decade ago and have used it ever since. It uses a >> static collection inside of the function with an optional parameter to add >> new variables to the collection. No optional parameter retrieved values >> using a name passed in. >> >> SysVar "MyVarName", MyVarValue to add >> MyVar = SysVar("MyVarName") to retrieve. >> >> This is so common a requirement, why does it take MS a decade to come up >> with the same functionality native to Access? >> >> Oh yea, I remember... pretty toolbars are *much* more important. >> >> And you wonder why there is not more real Access traffic on the list? >> Back in the day we were discussing the stunning advances of 97 over the >> old version 2.0, and then the equally stunning bugginess of Access 2000 and >> how to work around the issues and how to migrate 97 to 2000, and how to use >> the new code editor. And then we were discussing the bug fixes that came >> with Access 2002 and 2003. Classes and Events were available and stable >> and a lot to figure out there. >> >> And then things went quiet. Access 2003 was, all things considered, a >> stable mature product. The serious bugs that did still exist were never >> going to be fixed, even to this day. >> >> And then 2007 hit with its oh so enormous enhancements. and its oh so >> enormous new bug list. So there was a burst of traffic re that version. >> But of course it was pretty much not "developer" kind of stuff so mostly >> it was griping about the lack of developer support. >> >> And down hill from there. >> >> I now program mostly in C# and I absolutely love it. I mostly use SQL >> Server for my BE and I absolutely love it. So I for one don't have much to >> say because I am just lurking now. You guys are still friends and I will >> probably never leave because of that. I still pipe up when I have >> something useful to say. >> >> In the end the list is quiet because the Access world is quiet, at least >> from a developer's perspective, and we started as a developer list. >> >> John W. Colby >> Colby Consulting >> >> Reality is what refuses to go away >> when you do not believe in it >> >> >> On 9/17/2012 10:35 AM, Arthur Fuller wrote: >> >>> Oops! In my last post I referred to a new feature of Access and mistakenly >>> called it the Parameters collection. It's actually called the TempVars >>> collection. Sorry about that, folks. Another senior moment. >>> >>> >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/**mailman/listinfo/accessd<http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd> >> >> >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.**com<http://www.databaseadvisors.com> >> >> >>