Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Thu Aug 22 19:03:29 CDT 2013
Are you suggesting that XP is a security hole. Of course you have to ask yourself how vulnerable is Win2000 as no hacker would waste their time and personal respect on such product. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Dettman" <jimdettman at verizon.net> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 2:13:04 PM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Future of Windows XP Sorry, but I think your being naïve and silly<g>. There's been plenty of announcement about it, so they've more then covered their butts on it. I think when you'll hear a lot of screaming is when Office 365 drops support for the POP3 protocol. Outlook 2003 and a bunch of other mail clients will no longer work with it. Besides, XP is safer; all the hackers are now focused on Windows 7 and 8<g>. XP has been patched and patched. Don't know how many security holes are actually left in it. Jim. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William Benson Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 05:00 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Future of Windows XP I want to say that nobody replied to assertions in my post. I am really curious what the rest of this group thinks Microsoft will do in terms of security patches for Windows XP users left behind. Am I just being silly and naive to think that Microsoft would not dare such users dangling in the wind? -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com