John Colby
jwcolby at gmail.com
Fri Dec 13 13:48:57 CST 2013
LOL, I know you are yankin' my chain. I am "a duffer" ;) On 12/13/2013 2:46 PM, Tony Septav wrote: > Hey John > I love to have fun with the old warrior on this site. I never meant anything > but to just laugh with you. Yes "Gosh Darn" we get frustrated and we have > for years. But John I think we can call each other friends, at times you are > "a duff us". Waiting for the caustic reply. > > Tony Septav > Nanaimo, BC > Canada > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Colby > Sent: December-13-13 1:31 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] I just gotta vent > > LOL, I listen. > > I did say "I just gotta vent" did I not? I haven't heard anyone say it > isn't a bug, except for Shamil IIRC who called it "by design". And he > doesn't bother to explain wht a bug is "by design". In fact, isn't > EVERY bug "by design"? I mean we design the bug, but we normally try to > fix them. > > Tony, there's a million ways to skin a cat. The point is that I > shouldn't have to try a dozen cuts to find one that works. The damned > cat is complaining. > > On 12/13/2013 2:25 PM, Tony Septav wrote: >> Hey John >> You do not listen you old fart, time for hot milk and toast and a little >> siesta on the couch. >> >> Tony Septav >> Nanaimo, BC >> Canada >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Colby >> Sent: December-13-13 1:16 PM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] I just gotta vent >> >> Yep. All to work around a bug which is pretty annoying and which MS is >> too busy to fix. How can you not fix a bug where a form hasn't a clue >> that the control with the focus HAS the focus. >> >> On 12/13/2013 2:06 PM, Doug Steele wrote: >>> Sorry, didn't finish my thought. Your search textbox would be in the >>> parent form, so it wouldn't get confused by the empty subform. >>> >>> Doug >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Doug Steele <dbdoug at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Just off the top of my head - I've avoided problems with forms with no >>>> data by putting the actual data bound form in a subform of a 'dummy' >> parent >>>> form. I don't know if this would help you or not. >>>> >>>> Doug >>>> >>>> >>>>