David McAfee
davidmcafee at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 13:02:57 CST 2013
You're right. It's another developer's code, in their own section, so I don't want to go correcting them. I don't like getting warnings, much less errors, when building the project. I did remove ex when it wasn't being used, and the warnings did go away. I tend you use the ex when I put it in, so I didn't even think it wasn't needed. Thanks to both of you. David On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Steve Goodhall <steve at goodhall.info> wrote: > I believe you can write the "catch" without the parameter. Don't have the > right machine with me to verify that. I will tey it tonight. > > Steve Goodhall > > > -----Original message----- > From: David McAfee <davidmcafee at gmail.com> > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving < > accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 18:44:09 GMT+00:00 > Subject: [AccessD] OT C# Try Catch question > > Sorry for the OT question, just wondering if someone here knows the answer. > > try > { > //Some stuff here; > } > catch (Exception ex) > { > return false; > } > > The variable 'ex' is declared but never used > > You can get rid of the error by doing something like writing ex to the > console, but is there a better/standard way of avoiding the warning? > > > Thanks, > David > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/**mailman/listinfo/accessd<http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.**com<http://www.databaseadvisors.com> > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/**mailman/listinfo/accessd<http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.**com<http://www.databaseadvisors.com> >