[AccessD] OT: "D is for Databse" (?)

John Colby jwcolby at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 14:00:38 CST 2013


Way cool.
On Nov 26, 2013 2:52 PM, "Arthur Fuller" <fuller.artful at gmail.com> wrote:

> Lately I'm working on an app that contains exactly 50 classes (and the same
> number of "M" modules that instantiate the classes, and a large number of
> "I" modules (e.g. Implements). In fact, hardly any part of this app uses
> the traditional class-less approach to Access code.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Charlotte Foust <
> charlotte.foust at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Way back, I frequented Access-L until I discovered the "Developer" list
> and
> > started hanging out here, where the level of discussion was more
> technical.
> >  Don't recall there ever being a discussion of classes, etc. on the L
> list
> > when I still visited it.
> >
> > Charlotte
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:07 PM, DJK (John) Robinson <djkr at msn.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, referring back to some postings in June 2000 (to "
> > > access_list at list.simworld.com"), reference was made to
> > > "AccessDevelopers.Org Discussion List", or more often "Access
> Discussion
> > > List".  Hosted on a Screened Images server.
> > > Moderators included Hindman, Lembit Soobik and Anita Smith.
> > >
> > > So I go for Developers, or Discussion, but not Database.
> > >
> > > Showing my wrinkles!
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:
> > > accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dettman
> > > Sent: 25 November 2013 22:29
> > > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> > > Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: "D is for Databse" (?)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  Database is what I remember.
> > >
> > > Jim.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> > > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Darryl
> > Collins
> > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 05:18 PM
> > > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> > > (accessd at databaseadvisors.com)
> > > Subject: [AccessD] OT: "D is for Databse" (?)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Quiet times here, so time for an OT question.  One of the folks on the
> > > Excel list was asking about the list post fixes,
> > > you know the "-L" in  "Excel-L"; that sort of thing.  Someone asked
> what
> > > the D was for in Access D.  I suggested
> > > "Database".  Nathan (who admins the other list server) can explain
> about
> > > the "L" and "G", but probably won't know about
> > > the "D" over here.
> > >
> > > So - Given your history with Access-L and the setting up of database
> > > advisors, does anyone want to pip up with the story
> > > behind the "D" in Access D?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Darryl.
> > > --
> > > AccessD mailing list
> > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > AccessD mailing list
> > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > AccessD mailing list
> > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > >
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Arthur
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>


More information about the AccessD mailing list