[AccessD] RES: [Spam] Re: Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report

Roberto Ford Long rford at terra.com.br
Wed Sep 18 07:04:01 CDT 2013


Hi, Brad.
Some time ago, I ran on similar problem, but with Firebird database.
The server hardware was a Dell blade. I don't remember the model. 
But it had a raid controller with a little cache memory.
When the database size increased, the performance drops down a lot.
So, my guess: do a simple disk benchmark test, like copy a big file from one
folder to another, and then repeat the copy with a file of same size on your
desktop PC.
Good lucky.
Roberto.

> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-
> bounces at databaseadvisors.com] Em nome de Brad Marks
> Enviada em: terça-feira, 17 de setembro de 2013 15:20
> Para: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Assunto: [Spam] Re: [AccessD] Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report
> 
> All,
> 
> I conducted some additional tests early this morning before anyone else
was
> using the system.
> 
> I ran the long-running report (20 minutes).  While this was running, I
watched
> the system with the Windows Task Manager.  The Access report would often
> get 10-15% of the CPU.  The remainder of the CPU was going to the System
> Idle Process.
> 
> I then ran some smaller, faster running Access reports.  One such report
ran
> in 1 second on the smaller PC and took nearly 30 seconds to run on the
larger
> Server.
> 
> I also reviewed the ODBC connections.  They are set up exactly the same on
> the smaller PC as on the larger server.  I wanted to be sure that Tracing
and
> logging were not turned on.
> 
> This situation really has me puzzled.
> 
> Thanks for the help!
> 
> Brad
> 
> "All we are saying is give peas a chance" - International Legume Council
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 5:33 PM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report
> 
> Odd.  I'd ask about hardware differences between the two boxes but you
> say the server box used to be fast and is now slow.  So I'm assuming no
> hardware changes on the server.
> 
> Next thing I'd try to determine is if this slowness is unique to this app
or if
> other apps are experiencing the same slowdown.
> 
> R
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Brad Marks
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 1:23 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report
> 
> Rocky,
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> I have watched the Task Manager a few times and not seen anything else
> using a lot of the cycles.
> 
> This past weekend, I ran a number of tests, both on the Server and on the
> Stand-alone PC.
> 
> I am quite sure that nothing else was running on either of these two boxes
> during my tests.
> 
> The strange thing is that the stand-alone PC is able to generate the
report in
> less than half the time that it takes the Server to create the report.
> 
> It almost feels like the connection between the Server and the database is
> somehow different than the connection between the PC and the database.
> Both machines are using the exact same .accdr file and both are pulling
the
> same data from the same SQL-Server tables.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Brad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:33 PM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report
> 
> WAGS:
> 
> Other jobs running at the same time now that weren't running before taking
> machine cycles?  Change in priority of your job? Can you monitor the Task
> Manager for the server while your job is running to see what else might be
> going on?
> 
> R
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Brad Marks
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 12:25 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report
> 
> Rocky,
> 
> Yes, it is running entirely on the server, pulling data from a local
SQL-Server
> database.
> 
> Brad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:21 PM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report
> 
> Is it running entirely on the server with nothing coming across the wire?
> 
> r
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Brad Marks
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 12:15 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: [AccessD] Job Duration Puzzler - Access 2007 Report
> 
> All,
> 
> We have a high level Access 2007 Report that is generated every night.
> The data for this report is pulled from a number of SQL-Server database
> tables.
> 
> This report is automatically generated nightly on a server with these
specs
> - MS Window Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition SP2 2.50 Ghz
> 12 GB Ram
> 
> About a month ago, I noticed that the "run time" for generating this
report
> went from 8 minutes to 20 minutes.  Everything works fine, except that the
> run time has more than doubled.
> 
> I can also run this same report on a stand-alone PC with these specs -
> Windows XP SP3 2.50 Ghz
> 3.25 GB Ram
> 
> When the same report is generated on this PC, the job runs for about 8
> minutes.
> 
> Over the weekend, when nothing else was running, I conducted a number of
> tests to confirm what I was seeing.
> 
> The results were consistent.  The generation of this report takes more
than
> twice as long on the Server as compared to the PC.
> 
> I am very puzzled and not sure where to look.
> 
> I don't know why the run times went up dramatically on the Server.
> 
> I don't understand why the run times vary between the two boxes.
> 
> Any insights or advice would be most appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brad
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> --
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam.
> http://h0stname/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=26A7228C9A.3C04B
> 
> 
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> --
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam.
> http://h0stname/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=4D40928C9A.CB309
> 
> 
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> --
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> Click here to report this message as spam.
> http://h0stname/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=C07FE28CAC.33212
> 
> 
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list