Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Wed Feb 5 03:13:53 CST 2014
Hi John Not to mention the persistent bug for calculating the ISO week number 53 with the date functions. This has existed since 1.0 and is still in 2013. But there is more: It has been carried over to .Net, thus the similar VB.NET function have the same bug. /gustav -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af John W Colby Sendt: 4. februar 2014 20:36 Til: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Emne: Re: [AccessD] So Access has a Future? Superior? How can you say that? At least with Access once you discover a bug in Access2003 you can count on that bug being there for the rest of eternity! No more wondering whether you have to program around the bugs. You just KNOW that you do. You can plan for these things! Hell, some of our bugs have been around since Access 2000. ;) John W. Colby Reality is what refuses to go away when you do not believe in it On 2/4/2014 2:16 PM, Arthur Fuller wrote: > O well. Back to Alpha Anywhere, which is in every way superior. I can live > with that choice. > > Arthur > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Jim Dettman <jimdettman at verizon.net> wrote: > >> Yeah, but these are not your Access apps; their talking about 2013 web >> based Access applications. >> >> Any Access DB you have today can't be made through the store, nor 2007 or >> 2010 web DB's >> >> Jim.