Paul Hartland
paul.hartland at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 25 07:53:21 CDT 2014
lol everyone beat me to the SQL express backend reply, I have used MySQL a little but I do prefer the SQL Express, but that's just my personal preference, just need to learn vb.net or c# now on the studio express versions, but find it slow going, for some reason I find it hard to teach myself, but put me in a work environment or classroom and bang just seems to sink in fine.... Paul On 25 March 2014 08:55, Gustav Brock <gustav at cactus.dk> wrote: > Hi Brad > > With three users making 40 updates a day, an Access backend is the perfect > choice. > > However, there would be no reason to not use an SQL Express version as > backend if you can dedicate a machine to host it. It could be an old XP > machine with 500 MB ram and a decent disk. Given that you already joggle > with three different database engines plus Access, it may not be too clever > to introduce MySQL as a fifth. > > /gustav > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto: > accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af Brad Marks > Sendt: 24. marts 2014 22:16 > Til: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Emne: [AccessD] New Database Table - How to Proceed > > All, > > I have a question, but first I need to explain a little background. > > I work for a small manufacturing firm. The IT budget is VERY limited. > > We have a purchased Accounting system that uses a Pervasive Database. > > We have a purchased Manufacturing system that uses a Firebird Database. > > We have a Website that is maintained by an outside party. The website is > hosted by GoDaddy. It uses a Microsoft SQL Server database. > > Because all three of these databases are accessible via ODBC, I have been > able to use Access 2007 to build several inquiry and reporting systems. > Access works great for this purpose. > > Currently, updates are only permitted "through the front door" of these > three systems using the screens/pages that are provided. No updates via > ODBC are permitted. > > We do not have any "in house" database that can be used for updates other > than Access 2007. > > Recently I have starting working on a new project (using Access 2007) to > streamline our internal order processing. In order to do this, I will > need a new database with one table. Because of the size of the firm, the > number of orders is quite small, therefore the number of updates to the new > table will be quite small. > > When this new application goes live, there will be three users who will > need to make a total of about 40 updates per day to this new table. In > addition, there will be an Access 2007 batch application which will be run > two times per week. This application will make approximately 100 database > updates/additions each time it is run. > > Originally I was planning to use an Access 2007 (Split Back-end) database > for this application. > > Currently, no "Critical Business Data" is stored in any Access Database. > > I was also thinking about storing this new table in the Web Database > (SQL-Server on GoDaddy), but our Web Consultant has vetoed this idea. > > He also strongly recommends that we do not store the data in Access. He > recommends that we use MySQL. > > > > > So, here are the options that currently come to mind. > > Microsoft Access 2007 (Split Back-end) - Despite what our Web Consultant > says. > > MySQL - or one of its Forks (I have no experience with MySQL) > > Local Install of Microsoft SQL Server (I have concern about the price tag > and the amount of work - seems like a large overkill for just one table) > > Microsoft SQL Server (via a paid Hosted service - we have no experience > with this approach) > > Given all of this as background, which approach would be best? > > Other options ? > > Everyone here on AccessD has more experience than I do in this realm and I > value your ideas and insights. > > Thanks, > Brad > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- Paul Hartland paul.hartland at googlemail.com