Bill Benson
bensonforums at gmail.com
Thu Oct 2 13:44:17 CDT 2014
So if I understood, existing code (somewhere, somewhen) used "Windows 9*" as a name fragment to assist in recognizing if the given OS were Windows 95/98... and a genuine Windows 9 would potentially cause applications with that kind of lazy coding technique to now get their comeuppance. I don't see insulating misguided coding practices from the due rewards of their errantry to be a valid reason for skipping a version. May be true, but it's a silly condescension in my view. On Oct 1, 2014 9:43 PM, "Hans-Christian Andersen" <hans.andersen at phulse.com> wrote: > Don't see why. A name is just a name. They could call it whatever thy like > internally. > > - Hans > > > > On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:29 PM, Darryl Collins < > darryl at whittleconsulting.com.au> wrote: > > > > Good Theory and likely a real issue as well... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto: > accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin > > Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2014 11:22 AM > > To: 'Off Topic'; 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > > Subject: [AccessD] FW: Why they called it Windows 10, and not Windows > 9... > > > > another theory... > > > > _____ > > > > From: Noah Sutton-Smolin [mailto:noahsutsmo at gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 6:17 PM > > To: Rocky Smolin > > Subject: Why they called it Windows 10, and not Windows 9... > > > > > > Since Windows 2000, people have used the condition: > > > > if(os.version.startswith("Windows 9") || > os.version.startswith("Windows > > ME")) > > > > or some such equivalent to identify Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows > ME. > > > > It's in thousands of lines of code, all over the place. Calling it > "Windows > > 9" would break too many applications for Microsoft to bother. > > > > https://searchcode.com/?q=startswith%28%22windows%5C+9%22%29 > > > > > > ++Noah Sutton-Smolin > > Android Developer, EcoATM > > E: noahsutsmo at gmail.com > > H: 858-259-2592 > > C: 858-342-8926 > > > > PGP public key > > < > https://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x07C0E1EFD44 > > 10CD1> > > > > -- > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > -- > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >