Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Fri Sep 26 08:08:38 CDT 2014
If you insist on using the attachment field type, I agree. -- Stuart On 26 Sep 2014 at 11:39, Gustav Brock wrote: > Hi Susan > > Well, at least I think you should create and link to a separate accdb > for the attachment storage. This way many and/or large documents won't > ever gobble up your main data. > > /gustav > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af Susan > Harkins Sendt: 26. september 2014 13:30 Til: Access Developers > discussion and problem solving Emne: Re: [AccessD] Scanning documents > as attachment > > We're on a shared drive that's gainormous. I'm not worried about > space. The only reason she'd change a document would be if you chose > the wrong one in the first place. Each animal comes in with one or two > -- they don't change. She wants to know when she receives them and > then link to them so she can review them quickly instead of physically > finding them in a file cabinet somewhere. > > Guys, the new Attachment field is delightful. You double-click it and > it opens a dialog to let you find and select the file. Once there's a > file, you just click it to open it. I had to do absolutely nothing to > get it to work. For our purposes, that's good enough for me. :) The > ease has got me leaning toward a 10 easy things you didn't know you > could do in Access without a little sweat article or something like > that. :) > > Susan H. > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >