[AccessD] Problem of a listbox's response on network... Part 1
Arthur Fuller
fuller.artful at gmail.com
Thu Apr 9 18:03:47 CDT 2015
I would suggest that it is time for someone to write a test program that
addresses either a publicly available table or one that can be manufactured
easily by any interested party. The basic test would be to populate a
listbox with 1000 rows of data from said table.
Test 1, using a local attached MDB
Populate the listbox using DAO
Populate the listbox using ADO.
Test 2, using an attached MDB on the network
Populate the listbox using DAO
Populate the listbox using ADO.
Test 3, using an attached SQL Server database
Populate the listbox using DAO
Populate the listbox using ADO.
Obviously results will vary given hardware, cabling, and Access version,
but the results should be proportionally similar across all testbeds. SQL
version, Any volunteers?
Arthur
P.S.
Another idea also occurs to me, relevant only to the MDB on the network. I
personally have never tried this, but the possibility exists: read the data
once into a global array in the client MDB, and populate the listbox from
there anytime it's needed. This would avoid all subsequent reads during the
life of the program.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Bill Benson <bensonforums at gmail.com> wrote:
> Very interesting. My follow up would be, how much data can you fit into
> your sportscar versus the 18 wheeler? I would say the sportscar can get
> there faster but needs to take more trips...
>
> Seriously, where is the final analysis on this? John C is saying DAO is
> present at all times directing traffic, yet Jim is saying that ADO is
> faster than DAO.
>
> I am now thoroughly confused.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> > Hi Janet:
> >
> > Here is some questions answered about using ADO...1 of 3
> >
> > Regards
> > Jim
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim Lawrence" <accessd at shaw.ca>
> > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <
> > accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:40:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Problem of a listbox's response on network...
> Part 1
> >
> > Hi Mark:
> >
> > It does depend on where your program is pulling data.
> >
> > There is no substitute for speed when a local DAO connection is pulling
> > and displaying a single record or small group of records from a local MDB
> > database but have a DAO connection download 15K of records from a remote
> > server and fill a table with the results...
> >
> > An ADO connection can do that in one to two seconds. It is like comparing
> > a sports car to an 8 wheel semi, when it comes to moving data.
> >
> > In addition, shut down the central MDB database a few times through out
> > the day and you would be lucky not to corrupt your database. ADO type
> > connections expect delays...rebooted a MS SQL and when it restarted the
> ADO
> > data stream continued processing.
> >
> > There are trade offs for sure; DAO is great for small 2 to a 50 maximum
> > number users, in stable environments but if you are using industrial
> sized
> > data, ADO is the only way to go.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mark Simms" <marksimms at verizon.net>
> > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <
> > accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 6:55:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Problem of a listbox's response on network...
> Part 1
> >
> > Not to mention that ADO is SLOOOOWWW-D-O.
> > Omigosh, I love the speed of DAO. Yes, AC2010 is a bit slower than
> > AC2003....but so-be-it.
> >
> > > Excuse me? DAO is the database engine AND (more importantly) object
> > > model for all of Access. DAO
> > > is for programmers who need to program to the metal of forms,
> > > querydefs, controls and so forth. If
> > > you use ADO, it is all a layer on top of DAO.
> > >
> > > I am not disagreeing that ADO has its place, but "for power users" is
> > > just plain wrong. There is
> > > not an electron that flows through Access that DAO does not steer.
> > >
> > > John W. Colby
> >
> >
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
--
Arthur
More information about the AccessD
mailing list