[AccessD] MS Access 2010 or MS Access 2013 ??

Mark Simms marksimms at verizon.net
Fri Apr 10 20:55:25 CDT 2015


Bingo...I totally concur.
AC 2013 = super buggy.
I really had great results with both AC 2010 full and run-time.
Only exception was computed fields....that was buggy in 2010....but
workaroundable.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: AccessD [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf
> Of Bill Benson
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 4:48 AM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] MS Access 2010 or MS Access 2013 ??
>
> I think you are close enough to office 2016 horizon to skip 2013. I
> hate
> 2013 for access. I found 2010 Access quite stable, I don't seem able to
> develop in 2013 without for corruption issues fairly early on. Many
> times I
> cannot close tabs in Access by clicking the little x. It is just buggy
> in
> ways I can't even articulate... I plainly hate it.
> On Apr 10, 2015 4:39 AM, "Borge Hansen" <pcs.accessd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have not been frequenting the forum for a while...
> > Good to see all the familiar names still here...
> >
> > I did a quick search here on the forum about Access 2010 vs 2013,
> nothing
> > really came up
> >
> > Question: Office 2013 or 2010?
> >
> > The question is forced upon us with the sunsetting of MS Server 2003
> and
> > Office 2003
> >
> > I have a client with a MS Access 2003 app that have been ticking over
> since
> > year 2000 (yes, it was A97 then).
> > Last five years running on a MS 2003 Server in the cloud - RDP
> access.
> > Now they are forced to upgrade their Server with their Cloud Services
> > provider:
> > MS 2012 R2 Domain Controller and file server
> > MS 2012 R2 with IIS and SQL Server  (2012 Express to begin with)
> > MS 2012 R2 for remote desktops - six in all with Office 2010 32 bit!!
> > About US$10,000 for setting up
> > About US$1,000 per month for running this
> >
> > I've recommended Office 2010 32 bit for their Word, Excel and Outlook
> > (Exchange server hosted elsewhere) and of course the MS Access app
> that we
> > have developed and are maintaining for them.
> >
> > I have checked on our local virtual Windows 7 box that the current
> MS2003
> > Access app runs ok on MS Access 2010...  SQL Db backend and mdb for
> temp
> > files in the frontend. Home spun security.
> > I am so familiar with MSAccess 2003 - the ribbon is still something I
> have
> > to figure out how to incorporate into the UI if we go down that road.
> For
> > now we will stick with the old 2003 menu bespoke for the application.
> >
> > What do you recommend 2010 or 2013 ??
> >
> > /borge
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list