[AccessD] Printing to PDF on 64 Bit

True.  It's total address space rather than row/column count that matters. From a couple of 
different MS pages:

"64-bit Office doesn´t impose hard limits on file size. Instead, workbook size is limited only by 
available memory and system resources. On the other hand, 32-bit Office is limited to 2 
gigabytes (GB) of virtual address space, shared by Excel, the workbook, and add-ins that run 
in the same process. (Worksheets smaller than 2 GB on disk might still contain enough data 
to occupy 2 GB or more of addressable memory.)"

and 

"A data model´s share of the address space might run up to 500 - 700 megabytes (MB)"


-- 
Stuart


On 21 Jan 2015 at 16:41, Bill Benson wrote:

> I wouldn't use > 1 million rows as a reason either since Excel has
> these limits regardless of 32 bit or 64 bit.
> 
> Rows: 1,048,576
> 
> Columns: 16,384
> 
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gary Kjos <garykjos at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > I have no experience with 64 bit Access. My only exposure to it was
> > that it was mistakenly installed on my new 64 bit Windows 7 machine
> > at work and after I realized it was 64 bit Office I immediately had
> > the machine reimaged with a fresh copy of 64 bit Windows and loaded
> > with 32 bit Office and things have been working smoothly since.
> >
> > As Charlotte said, Microsoft themselves recommends you not use 64
> > bit Office unless you absolutely have to have some feature only
> > available there such as spreadsheets larger than 1 million rows.
> >
> > Sorry can't help you with this one. Good luck with it.
> >
> > GK