[AccessD] Entering an ISO date with input mask and full validation

Peter Hirons peter at galley.ie
Thu Jan 14 08:58:28 CST 2016


The year-first style is unambiguous and, as others have said, will sort 
correctly.

Maybe we should train you colonials to say 5th of January :-)

---


Peter

On 2016-01-14 14:44, Susan Harkins wrote:
> But how do we speak these days? In the US, we "say" January fifth,
> 2016. We don't say, 2016, January 5 or the fifth day of January 2016.
> So, why would we write it any differently? Does any culture speak the
> year first?
> 
> Why is the year first more easily understood? Only because someone
> likes it that way -- there's no inherent property that makes it this
> way.
> 
> Susan H.
> 
> Actually, what doesn't make sense is the mm-dd-yyyy layout. When you 
> see
> 01-05-2016 you can't be sure if it's 5th Jan or 1st May that the rest
> of the world would assume.
> 
> yyyy-mm-dd will be understood the world over and I, for one, would
> like it universally adopted.  Even countries that do not normally use
> the calendar based on some event around 2000 years ago will still
> understand.
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 2016-01-14 14:13, Dan Waters wrote:
>> Hi Gustav,
>> 
>> This format doesn't make sense, but is the reverse of what is
>> typically used in the US (mm-dd-yyyy).  I'm going to guess that
>> someone had a momentary bout of dyslexia and just read it backwards.
>> 
>> I like using yyyy-mm-dd whenever I can just because it sorts 
>> correctly.
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: AccessD [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf
>> Of Gustav Brock
>> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 3:31 AM
>> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Entering an ISO date with input mask and full
>> validation
>> 
>> Hi all
>> 
>> I received a reader comment on this, claiming that "the US uses
>> yyyy-dd-mm format".
>> 
>> This is new to me. I have never seen anything else than mm/dd/yyyy for
>> date formats related to the US.
>> Can anyone confirm the use of the yyyy-dd-mm format?
>> 
>> /gustav
>> 
>> 
>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>> Fra: AccessD [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af
>> Gustav Brock
>> Sendt: 1. januar 2016 19:47
>> Til: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>> Emne: Re: [AccessD] Entering an ISO date with input mask and full
>> validation
>> 
>> Happy New Year to all.
>> 
>> I've made a "sister" demo of the time entry textbox - now for a date
>> entry in the ISO yyyy-mm-dd format.
>> 
>> Again, a demo is included, ready to download and run:
>> 
>>     http://rdsrc.us/5xabOS
>> 
>> The error catching is somewhat different, but the inputmask plays a
>> big role.
>> 
>> /gustav
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> Fra: AccessD <accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com> på vegne af Gustav
>> Brock <gustav at cactus.dk>
>> Sendt: 11. december 2015 14:07
>> Til: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>> Emne: [AccessD] Entering 24-hour time with input mask and full
>> validation
>> 
>> Hi all
>> 
>> Years ago - in Access 2.0 - I made a form with a bound textbox for
>> 24-hour fool-proof input.
>> Recently, I had this need again, so I brushed it up for A2013/2016 and
>> wrote down the thoughts behind as a note on Experts-Exchange.
>> 
>> Here it is, including a demo ready to run:
>> 
>>     http://rdsrc.us/Le82yJ
>> 
>> It makes heavy use of an inputmask, the textbox's KeyPress event, and
>> the form's Error event.
>> 
>> /gustav
>> 
>> --
>> AccessD mailing list
>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


More information about the AccessD mailing list