[AccessD] Unbound control in continuous form

[Susan Harkins]

Yeah, but I thought maybe they'd made an improvement since it would be so
cool to just be able to "do" it. You have to jump through a lot of hoops to
work around it. Okay... a temporary table isn't all that difficult but
still... if they can give us a multi-value field, why not a continuous form
unbound control? 

Susan H. 


If you think about it logically, it must be so.  

Unless bound to a field,it is all the same control,  just like the labels
and any other type of control on the form.

It is the binding itself that makes a bound control unique to each row.

Otherwise: "There can be only one".  :)

--
Stuart

On 2 Mar 2016 at 14:23, Susan Harkins wrote:

> Thanks -- I did a bit of research and couldn't find any new 
> capabilities on this front. Thanks for confirming that.
> 
> Susan H. 
> Nothing new....you can add the control, but if unbound, then it's the 
> same for all rows.
> 
> Jim. 
> 
> 
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 


-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com