[AccessD] 64-but ONLY front end ?

James Button jamesbutton at blueyonder.co.uk
Fri Jan 6 11:47:39 CST 2017


Crude - and maybe cruel to the dev and maintenance staff
But would it be possible to split the FE into 2 separate activity groups 

JimB

-----Original Message-----
From: AccessD [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Ryan W
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 3:29 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Subject: Re: [AccessD] 64-but ONLY front end ?

Hi Jim,
 I get the internal constraints. The constraint I'm running into the the
allowable usable Virtual Memory of a 32 bit process is 2GB. Once I hit that
wall things crumble.   I don't believe I am hitting 2048 table ID's
limitation (and really, we only need 3 to 4 forms open most of the time) ..
the test in a 64 bit VM with 64 bit Office where I opened so many forms
that my tab area had left/right arrows was just a test that I could
actually *do* that without getting a resources exceeded message (which I
can get readily on my own workstation just opening enough forms).

I was hoping for another solution, as we have workstations here that use
our Access FE that are stuck on a 32 bit OS, which means we will lose
Access there (unless I continue to compile a 32 bit accde file) but then
they have to be wary of how many forms or objects they are working with
(which is the whole point of trying to fix this or move to 64 bit).

 I'm not sure I can get any more mileage out of what we have!  I follow
most of the best practice rules for access.  I close objects and unset
('nothing them') when they are no longer needed.  I don't allow dimensioned
variables to use the default "variant" type but not explicitly declaring
it's type and variants are only used where explicitly set.

  One area I could tweak (with a lot of work) would be unlinking subforms
from the tab control when that tab is not selected.  I do this in some
places but not all (I inherited thiscodebase)... which I am sure would help
some but would require quite a bit of re-work since some tab controls have
multiple (small) subforms on them.
-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list