[AccessD] Windows 10 & Access 2003
Rocky Smolin
rockysmolin at bchacc.com
Sun Sep 15 13:13:53 CDT 2019
I agree - Access 2010 - 32-bit. Because it works. And you can get them cheap. I like obsolete tech. It tends to work. :)
Rocky Smolin
Beach Access Software
760-683-5777
www.bchacc.com
www.e-z-mrp.com
Skype: rocky.smolin
-----Original Message-----
From: AccessD [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of James Button via AccessD
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2019 7:48 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Cc: James Button
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Windows 10 & Access 2003
Not having done any proper DBA work for over 10 years, but still dabbling, I would suggest retaining Office 2010 for it's simplicity in some areas where 2016 is annoyingly complex.
Then - considering the variants of Office
Avoid 2013 - 2016 etc. are better
There are the variants of standalone 2016 and 2019 that may be on some client systems
And then there are the online .com and subscription 365 variants with the associated (frequently changed) install on a PC '2016' now dubbed 365
As well as the 64 bit versions, that are now apparently the default
So upgrading really depends on the working environment -
Did you need 64 bit for the memory - and I have seen reports of some apps that work under 32 failing under 64 due to memory limits within the Access.
Maybe best to try to keep the 2010 32 bit, and a 2016 32 bit proving environment while developing for the web based .com 365 environment with, maybe a server or PC based set of system maintenance apps under the subscription 365 but avoiding the new features.
Complicated environment setup, - but the needs depend on your client/users environments
JimB
-----Original Message-----
From: AccessD <accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com> On Behalf Of fhtapia at gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2019 3:18 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Cc: Mark Simms <mar.ko at verizon.net>; David McAfee <davidmcafee at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Windows 10 & Access 2003
Thanks Mark,
So should users upgrade to Access 2010? Or 2016 to avoid issues and would
this sort of upgrade still work on an Access Database Project? (Adp)
Long story long,
My last place I worked at is upgrading all the user PCs to win10. When I
left they never hired anyone to take over migrating the legacy system which
was built on sqlserver BE and Access FE. The guys that would be able to do
this have all raised a white flag saying they wouldn’t have the first clue
as to how to help migrate the existing data to SAP ( a system the company
upgraded to in 2007. ). When I worked there the work on the legacy system
went from active to support, the project to import the data to sap went
cold and I got tasked with other priorities since after all I was available
to jump in and support any issues caused by os or access updates.
I left the company 2 years ago, I left documentation on how to migrate and
a fully documented database doc complete with views stored procedures and
information on how the sqlclr was utilized and what jobs were active along
with documentation on database triggers.
I was their Sr Dba and db Developer. I also worked on their sap bi team. I
had always wanted to get this legacy data over but never had an opportunity
since it was never considered a priority.
Thanks!
Francisco
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:03 PM Mark Simms via AccessD <
accessd at databaseadvisors.com> wrote:
> No, but there are issues related to running AC 2007 under Win 2010.
>
> Mark Simms
> marksimms at verizon.net
> http://www.twitter.com ;@QUI_TAM_MAN
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fhtapia <fhtapia at gmail.com>
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving <
> accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Sent: Thu, Sep 12, 2019 9:25 pm
> Subject: [AccessD] Windows 10 & Access 2003
>
> Anybody know if there are any comparability issues running access 2003 on
> Windows 2010?
> --
> -Francisco <http://twitter.com/seecoolguy>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
--
-Francisco <http://twitter.com/seecoolguy>
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
More information about the AccessD
mailing list