[AccessD] Access 2021 accde (64 bit) incompatible with Access 2013 64 bit

[Ryan Wehler]

What’s the skinny on the ODB handling? The rest I knew about but still find that minimal for 8 years of development time between 2013 and 2021. We’ve yet to see the Monaco editor that was promised this year, too. 

Not sure I call the giant red streak along the top (since 2016?) much of a UI refinement. In fact I had users come ask me how to get rid of it already. 

> On Dec 29, 2021, at 6:18 AM, Jim Dettman via AccessD <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Yes, along with support for DateTime2 in SQL, more robust ODBC connection
> handling, a new Linked Table Manager, UI refinements, numerous improvements
> in the SQL Editor, and quite a number of other things.
> 
> Access has not been standing still by any means.
> 
> Jim.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AccessD On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan
> Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 7:13 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2021 accde (64 bit) incompatible with Access
> 2013 64 bit
> 
> One major difference between 2013 and 2021 is the LargeNumber/BigInt data
> type 
> introduced in 2016.
> 
> 
>> On 28 Dec 2021 at 8:15, Ryan W wrote:
>> 
>> Okay fair enough. Your link does say that but Access has been so stale
>> on the development front for some time that the differences between
>> 2013 and 2021 are minimal AT BEST.
>> 
>> I've installed Access 2013 64-bit on a VM and compiled it. I guess
>> this will have to work for now.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> https://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> https://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com