[AccessD] Property Value is too large

John Colby jwcolby at gmail.com
Mon May 15 18:11:52 CDT 2023


Yea but nobody has said what the table is...


On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:51 PM Arthur Fuller <fuller.artful at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I remember that table,John. The approach I came up with was to store the
> columns as bits, in groups.
>
> On Mon., May 15, 2023, 1:05 p.m. John Colby, <jwcolby at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well you've piqued my curiosity.  What is the table?
> >
> > BTW I ran into the same kinds of issues with SQL Server as well.  I was
> > asked to deal with a database with a table that had more than 720 fields
> on
> > it and wanted to index many of them.  Same kind of thing, max number of
> > indexes in this case.
> >
> > On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 6:27 PM Stuart McLachlan <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > First time I've run across this in 30 years. I've been developing
> > > contantly in  Access since
> > > 1993 and never seen it before.
> > >
> > > When trying to add another field to a table, I got the message
> "Property
> > > Value is too Large"
> > > and couldn''t save the change. In fact I couldn't even save the table
> if
> > I
> > > deleted a field in it - I
> > > got the same error
> > >
> > > This particular , table (which I did not design - but a couple of
> people
> > > here might recognise)
> > > had 178 fields!   Many of the fields had "Lookup" Comboxes specified
> > > containing long SQL
> > > select statements. Also a load of long "Descriptions".
> > >
> > > It turns out that there is a limit to the size of a table definition
> that
> > > Acceess can store (2KB ? )
> > > and  this is not just for the table structure , it  includes the Lookup
> > > and Description data for
> > > each field and the Index definitions. ( there are 20 indexes specified
> > for
> > > this table, even just
> > > trying to delete one and saving the table gave the same message).
> > >
> > > After I cleaned a lot of the garbage out (primarily Lookup comboxes),
> I
> > > was able to add the
> > > field.
> > >
> > > Yet another reason why I dislike specifying anything other than the
> > > default for field display in
> > > the table design - IMNSHO, that's NOT where user interfaces should be
> > > specified!!!
> > > --
> > > AccessD mailing list
> > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > > https://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > John W. Colby
> > Colby Consulting
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > https://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> https://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>


-- 
John W. Colby
Colby Consulting


More information about the AccessD mailing list