Djabarov, Robert
Robert.Djabarov at usaa.com
Fri Aug 8 16:09:54 CDT 2003
Why not move everything to SQL? It will be highly inefficient to do any joins using 2 sources, unless taking the join to Access. This will definitely be inefficient. Robert Djabarov Sr. SQL Server DBA Phone: (210) 913-3148 Pager: (210) 753-3148 -----Original Message----- From: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Martin Reid Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:38 PM To: dba-sqlserver Subject: [dba-SQLServer]SQL Server Upsize Folks I am looking at a large Multiple Back End DB. We are converting it to SQL Server/MSDE heres is one option. I would like comments pleaseeeeeeeeeee All data heavy tables will be moved to SQL Server 2000. Other smaller tables whcih dont actualy contain a great deal of data will remain in Access MDB. We will then link the whole thing into the Front End. Move as much processing of this stuff to SQL Server, read only tto Pass Throughs. We are not using ADPS becasue of the recoding of the entire system. But it may be possible as there is a way to run DAO in an ADP. Anyone see any problems with this approach? Anyone care to suggest another? Any major problems joing local MDB linked tables to SQL Server Linked tables? Feel free to comment. I want to kick the options around. Martin _______________________________________________ dba-SQLServer mailing list dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver http://www.databaseadvisors.com