Robert L. Stewart
rl_stewart at highstream.net
Thu Jul 15 14:52:23 CDT 2004
Susan, Why not sort on the unconverted column and not include it in the result set? Robert At 12:12 PM 15/07/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:22:10 -0500 >From: "Susan Geller" <sgeller at cce.umn.edu> >Subject: [dba-SQLServer] Date field type >To: <dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com> >Message-ID: <DCE82B0926109E4B986BF32CFA78495C0DCC57 at MAIL1.cce.local> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > >In my sql server 2000 table, I have a date field. When I display that >field in a query it displays as yyyy-mm-dd and then a timestamp. I want >dd/mm/yyyy and no time. I converted it using this syntax >convert(varchar, milestone_dt, 101) and I get what I want, EXCEPT, when >I try to sort by that field, it sorts as a varchar, not as a date, so I >have all my January's together instead of all my 2004's together. Can I >have this format and still keep it as a date field so it will sort >correctly? > >--Susan