Michael Brosdorf
michael.broesdorf at web.de
Wed Mar 10 10:18:30 CST 2004
Is that true: no ADP's in Access 2003??? -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]Im Auftrag von Francisco H Tapia Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Marz 2004 17:09 An: dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com Betreff: Re: [dba-SQLServer] Arthur's article Are you kidding me? Access 2003 is sans ADP's!!!! :O. Well I guess that's all the more reason to convert my last project from an ADP to .Net2003 :( -- -Francisco Steven W. Erbach wrote: >Arthur, > >While I haven't devoted much time to keeping up with SQL Server developments I do subscribe to a couple SQL Server newsletters: SQL Server Central and Builder.com. My eyes lit on the headline "Enhance Enterprise Manager with Access." I thought to myself I thought, "Self, isn't that what Arthur Fuller has recommended lo! these many eons?" > >I read through to the bottom of the article and, sure enough, there's your moniker. There was also the open question, "Why did Microsoft kill ADP files in Access 2003?" I remember some time back before Access 2003 came out you were biting your tongue in the groups here because you were under an NDA. The only thing I remember you saying was something about how disappointed you were with Microsoft's direction with Access. > >In Access 2003 are we reduced to using ADO in code to get at SQL Server data? I suppose that ODBC is still an option if one wants to have direct manipulation of SQL Server tables, right? Sorry if these are naive questions; I've been wandering for a while. > >Regards, > >Steve Erbach > > _______________________________________________ dba-SQLServer mailing list dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver http://www.databaseadvisors.com