Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Tue Jun 20 10:23:06 CDT 2006
On 20 Jun 2006 at 14:26, Mark A Matte wrote: > Thanks Stuart, > > This is exactly what I need. I stripped down the original query to give > this example. Both tables are used in the original query. > > In your opinion...if you had to get this type of info from 80 mil+ > recordset...as far as speed goes...would you go multiple passes into temp > tables and join later, or case statements? > Hard to tell, but I suspect in this situation that the single pass would prove quicker. Why not try both ways and report back :-) -- Stuart