Robert L. Stewart
rl_stewart at highstream.net
Tue Sep 26 13:19:53 CDT 2006
Actually, John, you should add a timestamp column to the data. Then you can always get the last record added for any number of duplicates. At 12:00 PM 9/26/2006, you wrote: >Message: 1 >Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:21:19 +0000 >From: "Mark A Matte" <markamatte at hotmail.com> >Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] Accees Grouping Vs SQL >To: dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com >Message-ID: <BAY126-F19A3ADDF703CC38BB4107BD2240 at phx.gbl> >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > >John, > >I just kinda lurk on the SQL list...just wading through trying to >learn...and not sure if this could be a solution for you...but depending on >what version of SQL you're using, one of the following may be useful: > >@@IDENTITY >This is an intrinsic variable in SQL Server that contains the Id of the >record that was last created on this connection, regardless of the table. >IDENT_CURRENT('table') >This function returns the ID of the record that was last created in the >specified table. >SCOPE_IDENTITY >This variable contains the Id of the last record that was created within the >current scope, regardless of the table. > > >Good luck, > >Mark A. Matte > > > >From: "John Skolits" <askolits at ot.com> > >Reply-To: dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com > >To: <dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com> > >Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] Accees Grouping Vs SQL > >Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:58:38 -0400 > > > >Thanks for the responses. > > > >I really need Last since there are three records all with the same date and > >I want to take the last one entered. There is no Increment field so no way > >of knowing which is the last. With Access, I can be sure I have the right > >record, but in SQL, I'm not sure. I wonder how the Access SQL call is > >getting converted when it hits SQLServer when using First Or Last. > > > >I guess I can try to use the SQL tracer? I think that's what it's called, > >been a while since I've used it. That might help figure it out. > > > >Thanks. > > > >John > >