Robert L. Stewart
robert at webedb.com
Fri Jan 18 11:09:28 CST 2008
Maybe because they stop supporting it in April of this year. Sounds like a good reason to me. Another alternative no one has talked about is to get the developer version and install it on a machine there. It will have SSIS on it if you do the install of that portion of SQL Server. At 10:55 AM 1/18/2008, you wrote: >Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:51:06 -0500 >From: "Arthur Fuller" <fuller.artful at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] SSIS, SQL Server Integration Services, > DTS >To: "Discussion concerning MS SQL Server" > <dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com> >Message-ID: > <29f585dd0801180751s47dfead1rbef3e2a9ace38fe3 at mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > >A larger question emerges, in this context. Why is your client moving to SQL >2005 (or 2008 for that matter)? If SQL 2000 does everything required, why >move? I am a huge fan of the improvements in 2005, but if you don't need >them, why migrate? SQL 2000 is perhaps the most rock-solid product Microsoft >ever delivered, and if you cannot point to a concrete reason to move past >it, stay where you are, in the comfort zone. > >hth, >A.