Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Mar 13 11:03:37 CDT 2008
Hi John Sounds like replication to me. Can't you set that up from the SQL Manager? /gustav >>> jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com 13-03-2008 16:59 >>> I have two servers running Windows 2003 and SQL Server 2005. I would like to be able to have identical databases on both and work on both simultaneously, iow "keep them in sync". If I update a table on ServerA I need it to update on ServerB. If I update a table on ServerB I need it to update on ServerA. Is this possible? I do a fair amount of SQL Server stuff now and it is all running on ServerA. If it dies, then whatever I did is not on ServerB even though Server B is capable. If I somehow cause it to mirror stuff over to ServerB and then it dies, I could work on ServerB, but when I got ServerA working again, now I need to get the information synced back to ServerA. I have read a little about "failover" but that is not precisely what I am looking for. I would like to be able to run jobs on ServerA, then while that is running, run jobs on ServerB. When each finishes, the results need to post back to the other server. Is what I am trying to do possible, and if so where can I go to learn how to set it up. John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com