Arthur Fuller
fuller.artful at gmail.com
Fri Oct 3 17:41:02 CDT 2008
Interesting. Thanks for your "second pair of eyes" on this problem. Arthur On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Gustav Brock <gustav at cactus.dk> wrote: > Hi Arthur > > I don't see a problem with that approach. > > However, no matter how fast your C++ part is, the "disk part" may be slower > which means it takes a fraction of time to create, write and close the file; > a chance exists that the bulk insert will start reading a file before it has > been closed. > This can be avoided by creating the file with another name, say > xxx_20081103_01.tmp, and then let the C++ part rename it after it has been > closed to .csv. > > /gustav >