Francisco Tapia
fhtapia at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 16:59:10 CDT 2009
One minor change, (see below) also follow this link http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa175920%28SQL.80%29.aspx -Francisco http://sqlthis.blogspot.com | Tsql and More... On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, David McAfee <davidmcafee at gmail.com> wrote: > BEGIN TRAN JC1 > > SELECT Something > > INSERT INTO TABLE tblSomeTable > SELECT SOMETHING > > UPDATE tblSomewthing SET Something = SOmethingElse > > IF @@ERROR <> 0 > BEGIN > ROLLBACK TRAN JC1 > END ELSE BEGIN COMMIT TRAN JC1 END > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> > wrote: > > Is it possible to tell SQL Server to use transactions inside of a single > query? > > > > I routinely do things like update a single field for 50 million records. > It might be beneficial to > > be able to tell SQL Server to commit the updates every N million records. > I have no idea whether it > > is possible, or if it is what the results would be but I thought it worth > asking the question. > > > > Can it be done? Would it make any difference. > > > > -- > > John W. Colby > > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > _______________________________________________ > > dba-SQLServer mailing list > > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >