Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Wed Dec 28 15:55:19 CST 2011
Yada, yada, yada. Still evangelising I see :-) 100 million records is not per se a problem for a SQL structured DB. No matter how many times people claim that it is, NoSQL is NOT a replacement for SQL, NoSQL is just a group of solutions to manage types of data that SQL is not ideal for. You might just as well say: With images exceeding several megabytes in size, NoAccess is much better than Access for manipulating graphic data. Take for instance the NoAcess super application called PhotoShop. -- Stuart On 28 Dec 2011 at 12:42, Jim Lawrence wrote: > You have to look no further than the NoSQL super database called Hadoop. > Development in this product has been drawing the best and the brightest from > all over the computer world. > > With databases now exceeded 100 million records the SQL structured DBs no > longer functions well in this new environment. > > http://tinyurl.com/d28d3r6 > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > dba-Tech mailing list > dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >