jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Wed Dec 28 19:22:24 CST 2011
Yes, and everything I have read, the big brains in that technology say "it isn't a replacement for SQL databases". So the folks really in the know about NoSQL are saying point blank that NoSQL solves different problems and you still need SQL for problems that SQL fits. John W. Colby Colby Consulting Reality is what refuses to go away when you do not believe in it On 12/28/2011 4:55 PM, Stuart McLachlan wrote: > Yada, yada, yada. > > Still evangelising I see :-) > > 100 million records is not per se a problem for a SQL structured DB. > > No matter how many times people claim that it is, NoSQL is NOT a replacement for SQL, > > NoSQL is just a group of solutions to manage types of data that SQL is not ideal for. > > You might just as well say: > With images exceeding several megabytes in size, NoAccess is much better than Access for > manipulating graphic data. Take for instance the NoAcess super application called > PhotoShop. > >