Francisco Tapia
fhtapia at gmail.com
Wed Jan 5 14:50:33 CST 2011
Thanks I'm going to be adding some new stuff soon On 1/5/11, Jim Lawrence <jlawrenc1 at shaw.ca> wrote: > A nice new blog you have there fransico. > > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Francisco > Tapia > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:41 AM > To: Discussion concerning Visual Basic and related programming issues. > Cc: Sqlserver-Dba; Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] [dba-VB] SQL Server security > > -Francisco > http://bit.ly/sqlthis | Tsql and More... > > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:00 AM, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>wrote: >> >> I do not have experience in a transactional database using SQL Server, but >> I am thinking that SQL Server express 2005 will not have an issue keeping > up >> with this kind of usage - 25 users adding records to this table all day >> without causing locking issues like I am seeing now. >> > > It's been a while since I did a conversion, I don't remember if you need to > make all your fields varchar or nvarchar, but that's the gist. I remember > also going unbound to simplify the data entry process, but ymmv with that > piece of advise. We have SQL Server running in the backend for many of our > transactional systems and we have > than 25 users all w/o locking problems. > > My issue at this point is that they use a network logon and force the users >> to change their password every 30 days. Is SQL Server going to use that >> same network username / password database or does it use a list of > usernames >> / passwords physically on the server itself? IOW will Windows >> authentication work or will I need to go to SQL Server username / > password? > > > Windows Authentication will work just fine. To simplify the user to server > problem, you'd want the network admin to add your users who have access to > the application to a specific domain group... then just give access to the > domain group. You can even put security around who has access to what based > on domain group, works a treat. If you have too much difficulty with that > you can always fall back to sql authentication, but I always prefer windows > authentication except for the web apps we have... > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- Sent from my mobile device -Francisco http://bit.ly/sqlthis | Tsql and More...