Arthur Fuller
fuller.artful at gmail.com
Tue Sep 20 02:01:54 CDT 2011
As a semi-retired person, I have time to investigate such things, and while not claiming expertise in this particular (NoSQL) area, I have done some investigation. My conclusions: 1) this is NOT for transactional databases (with ACID etc.) 2) this is a superb solution for Web-based dbs (i.e. lots of text-pages, and potentially millions of simultaneous hits On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Hans-Christian Andersen <ha at phulse.com>wrote: > John, > > Good question. I don't know, to be honest, but I get the sense that most of > the momentum these days are in nosql databases. > > Hans-Christian > > > > On 19 September 2011 07:28, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > > > So what is the real deal with MySQL community version? Is it still > > maintained and advanced by the open source development community? Is it > a > > dead end? Is MariaDB the replacement going forward? > > > > > > John W. Colby > > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > > On 9/19/2011 5:31 AM, Hans-Christian Andersen wrote: > > > >> Arthur, > >> > >> Have a look at MariaDB. It's basically a version of MySQL which is > >> maintained and developed by Monty& co and, quite frankly, is better in > >> many > >> ways, as they have the freedom to advance the database in ways that the > >> MySQL devs at Oracle are just not able to. > >> > >> > >> Hans-Christian > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 17 September 2011 18:52, Arthur Fuller<fuller.artful at gmail.com**> > >> wrote: > >> > >> There are some nice things about MySQL but on the other hand I > definitely > >>> do > >>> not like where Oracle is going with this puppy since its acquisition of > >>> Sun > >>> and by inheritance MySQL. I'm still on the fence about these > >>> developments, > >>> but quite frankly I am leaning against Oracle on all these > transmutations > >>> of > >>> what was originally a simple, straightforward approach. At last > >>> recollection, Monty has departed, and with him, I fear, has the guiding > >>> vision of this product. > >>> > >>> Frankly, I am all over the place on where next to go: I look at Mongo > and > >>> see it exquisite for web-apps but not for OLTP situations. I look at > >>> PostGreSQL and think it's got a bunch of things right. I look at Oracle > >>> and > >>> MS-SQL and think they have some things right as well. I frankly do not > >>> have > >>> any clue into which basket to toss my next eggs. > >>> > >>> Arthur > >>> > >> ______________________________**_________________ > > dba-SQLServer mailing list > > dba-SQLServer@**databaseadvisors.com <dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > > > > http://databaseadvisors.com/**mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver< > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver> > > http://www.databaseadvisors.**com <http://www.databaseadvisors.com> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >