J- P
jnatola at hotmail.com
Wed Aug 14 13:40:37 CDT 2013
I am making the changed on the 2003 server as per the article, One thing that has me puzzled is that looking at the memory usage of sqlserv.exe its at 1.5gb, i thought sql express was limited to 1 GB of memory , or did I misunderstand what I read? Jean-Paul Natola > From: fhtapia at gmail.com > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:39:20 -0700 > To: dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] Access disconnecting from sql express DB > > so to help troubleshoot your version of windows 2003 r2 and the sql server > engine, follow the tips in this kb > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942861 > > and report back if any of it helps (or is unhelpful). > > good luck! > > -Francisco <http://twitter.com/seecoolguy> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Francisco Tapia <fhtapia at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey JP, > > I would grow the log to at least 10%, this will keep it from fragmenting > > too quickly, in general this is the size you want for your transaction > > log. (the exception is if you perform large table modifications that eat > > up larger than the 10% size you set up) > > > > lastly, if you can I would build a small c# windows app, that hooks into > > your database. and have it email you or alert you whenever it disconnects > > from the server. The problem you are experiencing may still be database > > engine related. > > > > > > -Francisco <http://twitter.com/seecoolguy> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:54 PM, J- P <jnatola at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> So I changed recovery to simple, did a shrink via smss and selected log, > >> shrink, reclaim unused space > >> and WOW did it shrink, it went down to 1MB , thats not even 1 % , much > >> less 10% of the DB size (hope I didnt muck it up) > >> > >> Then > >> I reverted back to full recovery , ran a full backup and a log backup > >> and its still working, as far as versions they are the following ; > >> > >> 2003 r2 sp2 > >> sql 9.0.5000 sp4 > >> > >> What > >> are items I should look for in a trace that should be considered > >> "flags" - this DB started in access 97, went through many hands and > >> "coders" (using the term loosely,) then went to sql express , and the > >> front end has gone from Access 97 to 2000, , xp, 2003, and now on 2010 > >> > >> So there are many places that it could go wrong- If I were to open a PSS > >> case, should I open an Access 2010 case or SQL case? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dba-SQLServer mailing list > >> dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > >> http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com >