[dba-SQLServer] PK/ANPK Debate

Hehehehe.. Indeed indeed.  Who needs SQL anyway ;)



-----Original Message-----
From: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Salakhetdinov Shamil
Sent: Wednesday, 12 March 2014 4:26 PM
To: Discussion concerning MS SQL Server
Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] PK/ANPK Debate

 Yes, but here in dba-SQL-Server "SQL Server vs. NoSQL" "holy war" thread would be more suitable than "Bound vs Unbound controls", should we ask Arthur to initiate it? ;)


Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:00 AM UTC from Darryl Collins <darryl at whittleconsulting.com.au>:
>Bound  vs Unbound controls also seems to be a topic that gets folks, ummm, passionate, about their position I have noted...
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com 
>[mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of 
>Francisco Tapia
>Sent: Wednesday, 12 March 2014 6:41 AM
>To: Discussion concerning MS SQL Server
>Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] PK/ANPK Debate
>
>On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Arthur Fuller < fuller.artful at gmail.com >wrote:
>
>> Said mission was not to prove
>> or even posit my point, but to kick the ashes and see whether the 
>> embers are still burning. And they are! Nothing like a hot topic to 
>> awake the sleeping dragons.
>>
>
>hahaha, you know this topic sparks an un-holy war! XD
>
>It's even more religious than the thou shall not use cursors in your SQL!!!
>lol
>
>
_______________________________________________
dba-SQLServer mailing list
dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver
http://www.databaseadvisors.com