Stuart McLachlan
stuart.mclachlan at gmail.com
Thu Mar 13 03:28:03 CDT 2014
Access FE to Access BE - almost total bound. Access FE to SQL Server/MySQL BE - sometimes bound/ sometines unbound depending on the circumstances and the datasets involved. Any other FE to any BE - total unbound. -- Stuart On 13 Mar 2014 at 3:17, Darryl Collins wrote: > Yeah, I would have hoped we have moved on by now. For what it is > worth, I have been firmly in the unbound camp for many years. > > Regards > Darryl. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim > Lawrence Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2014 11:53 AM To: Discussion > concerning MS SQL Server Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] PK/ANPK Debate > > Hi Francisco: > > I think that whole discussion has moved on. I seriously doubt whether > suggesting a "bound" database is even an issue now, is a stretch and > those still supporting it, IMHO, are on pare with members of "The > Fall-Earth Society". The "bound" argument was flimsy even back in the > late nineties or as soon a real ACID databases became the industry > standard...and the realization that there was just not enough > band-width, nodes or servers to support object binding. > > Jim > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Francisco Tapia" <fhtapia at gmail.com> > To: "Discussion concerning MS SQL Server" > <dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 > 7:27:30 AM Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] PK/ANPK Debate > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Darryl Collins < > darryl at whittleconsulting.com.au> wrote: > > > Bound vs Unbound controls also seems to be a topic that gets folks, > > ummm, passionate, about their position I have noted... > > > > only because the bound folks can't disassociate with the the critical > requirement in today's world of being disconnected from the datasource > for local caching and synching ;-) > > [granade thrown...] > > > -Francisco <http://twitter.com/seecoolguy> > _______________________________________________ dba-SQLServer mailing > list dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >