Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Tue Jan 20 14:47:13 CST 2015
Good set of comments...nothing that I would disagree with. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Kjos" <garykjos at gmail.com> To: "Discussion concerning MS SQL Server" <dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:01:14 AM Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] DB-Engines list of top 10 databases Did you look at the method of ranking...... Seems kind of bogus to me. Not by number of installations. Not by number of records managed. No, its by the number of mentions on websites and the number of google searches. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method of calculating the scores of the DB-Engines Ranking The DB-Engines Ranking is a list of database management systems ranked by their current popularity. We measure the popularity of a system by using the following parameters: Number of mentions of the system on websites, measured as number of results in search engines queries. At the moment, we use Google and Bing for this measurement. In order to count only relevant results, we are searching for "<system name> database", e.g. "Oracle database". General interest in the system. For this measurement, we use the frequency of searches in Google Trends. Frequency of technical discussions about the system. We use the number of related questions and the number of interested users on the well-known IT-related Q&A sites Stack Overflow and DBA Stack Exchange. Number of job offers, in which the system is mentioned. We use the number of offers on the leading job search engines Indeed and Simply Hired. Number of profiles in professional networks, in which the system is mentioned. We use the internationally most popular professional network LinkedIn. Relevance in social networks. We count the number of Twitter tweets, in which the system is mentioned. We calculate the popularity value of a system by standardizing and averaging of the individual parameters. These mathematical transformations are made in a way so that the distance of the individual systems is preserved. That means, when system A has twice as large a value in the DB-Engines Ranking as system B, then it is twice as popular when averaged over the individual evaluation criteria. The DB-Engines Ranking does not measure the number of installations of the systems, or their use within IT systems. It can be expected, that an increase of the popularity of a system as measured by the DB-Engines Ranking (e.g. in discussions or job offers) precedes a corresponding broad use of the system by a certain time factor. Because of this, the DB-Engines Ranking can act as an early indicator. On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Arthur Fuller <fuller.artful at gmail.com> wrote: > *Top 10 database management systems, ranked on popularity, Nov 2014. > Source: DB-Engines <http://db-engines.com/en/ranking>* 1 *Oracle* 2 *MySQL* > 3 *Microsoft SQL Server* 4 *PostgreSQL* 5 *MongoDB* 6 *IBM DB2* 7 *Microsoft > Access* 8 *SQLite* 9 *Cassandra* 10 *Sybase ASE* > A few things surprised me: that MySQL is ahead of SQL Server; that Mongo > has become so popular so quickly, and that Access is still in the Top 10. > > -- > Arthur > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- Gary Kjos garykjos at gmail.com _______________________________________________ dba-SQLServer mailing list dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver http://www.databaseadvisors.com