Francisco H Tapia
my.lists at verizon.net
Thu Aug 28 11:12:41 CDT 2003
Tortise at Paradise wrote: > From: "Francisco H Tapia" <my.lists at verizon.net> > To: "Discussion of Hardware and Software issues" <dba-tech at databaseadvisors.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:17 AM > Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] Security measures > > > Steven W. Erbach wrote: > <snip> > >>VERY good advice. I use Norton Ghost on a regular basis though I have never >>needed to make the Ghosted drive the main drive due to a failure of the >>primary. I assume that all that needs to be done is for the master/slave >>jumpers to be moved around and you're back in business, right? > > > I create images not ghost to a mirror drive... the diffrence is you can > (depending on the amount of data on your main hdd) have 2-3 or more > images on one hdd... I've got an old 300mb Original image for win2k w/ > nothing loaded except the SP2 patch and Office 2000. It's quite a bit > easier this way cuz you can just take your corrupted OS dump the image > on it placing you back before the patch was installed. > > NEW STARTS here! > How do you "dump the image" back exactly. Sounds great. What software do you use? Does this work over an existing installation of > W2K or XP with other programs installed???? I presume it doesn't and one has to reload all the programs. Is that what you mean? > In that case the benefit is saving the chunk of time to recreate the drive back to that level? > TIA > Kind regards, dump the image refers to copying the image of a hdd back to a destination partition or disk. When using Norton Ghost software you are given the choice of mirroring (copying) a disk, or creating an image. You are also given a choice of writing back to the source disk by dumping the image back to the disk. I think the menu calls it copy but I've grown accustom to the command line arguments that I commonly refer to it by it's actual parameter name 'dump' an image is just that... a complete copy of the original, thus if you had office, sql server, iis and the like loaded, you would not have to re-load all the data back.... to write back to the disk does not take too long at all, this of course depends on your hdd setup, It commonly takes me about 15-30 minutes depending on the size of the disk... for anything greater than 40gig I believe it takes about 30 minutes.... i've seen it take longer too, for a 60 gig hdd, the IS took like 2.5 hrs just to get the partition right.. but this of course was also cuz they plugged in the 2 drives off the same channel. something you would not want to do when imaging or mirroring... most commonly you'd want the max output of your drive thus moving it to an isolated channel, unless of course you use SCSI. :) -- -Francisco