Erwin Craps
Erwin.Craps at ithelps.be
Wed Nov 5 05:47:35 CST 2003
I conclude that your server first spools the print jobs on the server first?! You would need to create a different ip range for that second nic and printers. That would make thing more complicated. Furthermore when your server first spools the job, that means that a print job is send twice over the network once from the client to the server and once from the server to the printer. You could change the clients to print directly to the IP printer. This is great for the switch and bandwith but has a disadvantage. The printjob is queqed on the client pc and has to be on during printing. This can be a problem when people start large job overnight. It also charges the client pc more. If your printers have a hard disk they will store the job on to their disk and you don't have that issue. But most networkprinter do not have a hard disk (in my customerbase). You could however buy a swithch whre you can team up two network cards. It is posible with some brands to combine two ports on the switch with two nics on the server. This for fault tolerancy and/or combined bandwith, resulting in a 200Mb pipe between server and switch. Both nics are seen as one nic to the os. I believe the cost of a 1Gb link between switch and server will not be much more expensive. A switch with 1 or 2 1Gb ports are not that uncommon anymore on swithches. All other ports may be 100Mb Please note that I'm not saying this will resolve your problem. Network problems and bandwith can be very complicated and even be different depending on the time of day. for example, if your current server is today not powerfull enough a switch will not help much or nothing at all. Erwin -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com namens Francisco H Tapia Verzonden: di 4/11/2003 19:25 Aan: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues CC: Onderwerp: Re: [dba-Tech] Re: [] Wireless network (sort of) Would it be helpful to add a 2nd Nic and bind all print job request trough it, and leave the original nic for standard file server access? I don't know how to do this, but I can only imagine that it could be done. throw a Switch in there in place of the hub and you've updated your network w/ 1 nic + the number of switches required. John Colby wrote: >Erwin, > >A collision is when one computer is transmitting and another starts >transmitting over the top of the first. The result of a collision is that >the data is corrupted and has to be retransmitted. > >This can happen in a hub because ALL computers share a single physical >electrical connection. This simply cannot happen with a switch because the >electronics set up a unique electrical connection from computer to computer >using a cross point switch. > >With an eight port switch you could under ideal circumstances have four 100 >mbit conversations going on simultaneously. There would be no collisions at >all, four perfectly completed communications. > >Now obviously if a server is on one port and all the other ports want to >talk to that port then only one at a time can do so, but you still NEVER >have collisions since the electronics simply don't connect port A to port B >unless port B is not in use. > >So yes, you have a bottleneck, all communications needs to go through a >single port to get to the server, but NO, true collisions (one computer >transmitting on top of and corrupting data of another computer) NEVER happen >with a switch. > >John W. Colby >www.colbyconsulting.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >[mailto:dba-tech-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Erwin Craps >Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:07 AM >To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues >Subject: RE: [dba-Tech] Re: [] Wireless network (sort of) > > >Thats not to