Haslett, Andrew
andrew.haslett at ilc.gov.au
Thu Aug 5 04:40:01 CDT 2004
Bit confused as to this issue.. So its just the syntax we're discussing, not not the logic? I still don't see an issue with testing for nothing... The original post suggested we t'est for the positive' instead, wihich I disagree with. Consider: If Ralph IS NOT 'AtHome' Then 'Ring Ralph on Mobile' End If as oppsoed to: If Ralph IS 'InCar' OR Ralph IS 'AtWork' OR Ralph IS 'AtTheShop' OR Ralph IS 'AtTheFooty' etc... .. Its obviously better to test for the negative in some cases... Cheers, A _____ From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk] Sent: Wed 4/08/2004 4:50 PM To: Discussion of Hardware and Software issues Subject: Re: [dba-Tech] On Odious Code Hi Arthur > .. so I guess I'm a pedant. You are. But take it as a positive label - there is too much sloppiness around. /gustav _______________________________________________ dba-Tech mailing list dba-Tech at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech <http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-tech> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com <http://www.databaseadvisors.com> IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ ******************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may contain information protected by law from disclosure. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. No warranty is given that this email or files, if attached to this email, are free from computer viruses or other defects. They are provided on the basis the user assumes all responsibility for loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from their use, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not.