Gustav Brock
Gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Dec 9 02:44:13 CST 2004
Hi Mark Yes, though the free Lite thing only. Didn't make much of a difference but neither did my machine have a speed issue. /gustav >>> mark.breen at gmail.com 08-12-2004 20:17:56 >>> Hello Gustav, Did you use the XP Lite? I was working on a PC last week that was standalone, no CD ROM and no network card even, it was fast and very comfortable to use. It made me think about my own PC with '00's of services running and I realised that more CPU power may not be the way to go. Of course, perhaps we do not need XP Lite, we could just turn off some of the services, but then you wonder, "maybe I need that" Thanks for the tips, Mark On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:12:47 +0100, Gustav Brock <gustav at cactus.dk> wrote: > Hi Arthur > > These "boosters" and "optimizers" are fake. > > Only hard work counts: > > http://www.ccleaner.com/ > > It will clean up your machine at zero cost. > The other methods are called "adding more ram" > - and "remove spyware": > > http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html > > Also XP Lite: > > http://www.litepc.com/ > > A free somewhat limited version is available. > > /gustav > > >>> artful at rogers.com 05-12-2004 20:47:06 >>> > > > Does anyone know of a free Windows performance booster ala the > commercial product PC Booster? In my current state of impecuniousness, > > it will have to be a free one.