Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Tue Jan 20 08:09:37 CST 2004
Hi William > ...Linux is open source gustav ...Xandros wants $89 for its implementation > ...Xandros either adds value via their cross-Windows code or wants me to pay > for what I can otherwise get for free ...if they actually add value to > justify an $89 price, who besides Xandros is supporting their > implementation? ...ergo, its a proprietary implementation of Linux :( Ahh, William, you know better - it's an implementation ... proprietary is a difficult word to append to Linux. > ...as for your comments re IBM, you'd best update your news source ...IBM > backed WWWAAAAAAYYYY off that statement the very next day saying it was only > a desired objective, had no force de jure, and no division even had such a > move on the planning board ...the very next day Forrester Research released > a study showing that despite the hype, its survey of corporate IT showed > less than 5% of firms even had a plan to explore open source in the next > five years :( Sorry, haven't heard of that. > ...in other words, just like with Sun's alleged conversion to Open Source, > the Linux community hyped something that is at least as bad as the vapor > ware we're used to from MS ...if Linux is to gain any credibility in the > real world as a viable business/consumer desktop OS, it has to stop this > continual spin and start delivering ...as in Open Office ...I put it on a > test system a few months back and came away angry at wasting so much time on > something with less functionality and far more bugs than the old MS Works :( It seems like the results of your reviews often are quite different from those of others. /gustav >> Linux proprietary ... that was new, William.